From the category archives:

Elephants (R)

Ayn Rand Speaking to the Elephants

by Drima on December 20, 2007

It might seem odd to many (especially Muslims), but I am deeply intrigued by Ayn Rand. Up until recently, I only knew small bits of information about her and the views she espoused. Lately though, I find myself getting acquainted better and the more I read, the more I’m fascinated.

The woman was tough and confidently outspoken. In this video she makes a number of solid points.

Her words left me wondering though.

As a Muslim I have trouble accepting human reason purely and solely as my guiding compass. Our intellect isn’t perfect. Reducing our existence within the elaborate order of our universe to mere coincidence seems far-fetched to me. I don’t believe it’s all some random accident.

In comes revelation. In too (and along with it) come numerous questions and hence the need to use human intellect in order to attempt to answer those questions - some of which are highly troublesome. Many get answered. A few others - Free Will Vs Predestination for example - have no intellectually satisfying answers. In comes faith.

The Question is, on which do we rely more, faith or reason? By default the answer to me is most definitely reason but that may change sometimes depending on what exactly we’re discussing. I however certainly prefer to rely on reason more than faith. One thing is for sure though, I don’t exclusively subscribe to either one or the other and I’m definitely not in favor of faith being the dominant factor in matters of the state.

Let’s do this and that because God said so? Hmm… No thanks. I prefer a strict system of Shura in place resulting in a representative democracy. Of course it would be completely useless if the majority relied excessively on faith anyway and there were no constitutional limits to protect peoples’ rights.

The aforementioned is related to ideas of mine written in a previous post:

What constitutes knowledge and what doesn’t to a particular society? In the West there is a higher emphasis on empiricism rather than revelation. In the Muslim world, the emphasis is instead generally on revelation.

Epistemology (let alone Islamic Epistemology) can be both fun and a headache.

I don’t believe I’ll ever reach a satisfying answer to the Free Will Vs Predestination issue. Philosophers have wondered about it and debated it for thousands of years to no true avail. I don’t expect to have better luck (ah, don’t even get me started about the idea of luck).

I have two choices. Give up. Or have faith.

I choose a third option. To have faith while I simultaneously delve deeper in hopeful pursuit of satisfying answers and “aha” moments.

And for now… Some Ayn Rand.

{ 29 comments }

The Newfound Muslim Love For Ron Paul

by Drima on November 21, 2007

And its reasons. I love the guy. He’s so entertaining in presidential debates. Oh and he has very unique views on Darfur too. :)

{ 10 comments }

More Pictures By Michael Yon

by Drima on November 19, 2007

Check them out here. I love the commentary he provides:

LTC Michael told me more than once that the Muslims reached out to him to protect the Christians from al Qaeda. Real Muslims here are quick to say that al Qaeda members are not true Muslims.

… The interpreter “Ice,” pictured here with members of the congregation outside St John’s after mass, grew up in this neighborhood. His family is Christian and St. John’s is their church. I asked Ice if the Muslims treat the Christians poorly in Iraq, and he said what other Iraqi Christians and Muslims have also told me: an unequivocal “No.” Ice said they had no problems at all until al Qaeda instigated friction between people.

It’s too bad that a huge portion of the American Right continues to insist “Islam is an evil death cult”. I prefer the other camp, the one which actually gets it. Islam and its interpretation is as monolith as we Muslims ourselves are. You’ve got the “Islamic Left” - progressive Muslims, secular Muslims, Sufis etc. - and you’ve got the “Islamic Right” - Wahhabis, Salafis etc. Yup, that’s pretty damn monolith I say.

{ 18 comments }

How the Blue Donkeys Could Take Over

by Drima on November 4, 2007

This cracked me up so badly!

… it occurred to me that Democrats really don’t need to do anything. All liberals need to do is sit back and watch while the whole Republican government resigns after it’s discovered that they’re all actually gay.

That makes at least three this year. Mark Foley, Larry Craig and Richard Curtis. Am I missing someone?

Am I the only one finding this hilarious? :D

{ 2 comments }

Why Is Marijuana Like Soooo Illegal?

by Drima on October 19, 2007

Me, me, me, I know why, I know why, please let me answer.

Ehm ehm, it’s a conspiracy. Shhhhh!!

Yes, it is. Apparently the tobacco and alcohol lobbyists are the ones behind the lies and propaganda exaggerating the dangers of the relatively harmless drug and making it seem similar to the very dangerous ones such as cocain, heroin, ecstacy and meth. Plus these greedy lobbyists know very well that if marijuana gets legalized, their profits will come diving down like a crazy World War II Kamikaze.

Okay fine, let’s get serious. Yes, there is some truth to the aforementioned but are there other reasons? Why is it illegal? No, not in Sudan. There even alcohol is illegal. After all it’s a majority Muslim country and most Muslims want no alcohol or marijuana (for the record I don’t smoke weed or drink alcohol but I do enjoy shisha).

I’m talking about America. Alcohol is super abundant here and it’s legal but weed isn’t. Why? I mean scientific research shows that both substances - unlike other hardcore drugs - are relatively the same in terms of harmful effects. Some even say alcohol is more harmful than weed. In mainstream American culture, alcohol is a part of most adult social gatherings (just like it is in many other places in the world). Why is the attitude towards marijuana different and why is it illegal? 

So, besides the tobacco and alcohol lobbyists, what are the reasons? Maybe economic ones are also part of the answer. The “underground” economy is worth billions in various American states, especially California. Legalization will mean bye bye to all that money.

Any other reasons?

Just a random question that popped into my head after stumbling on a Facebook cause calling for the legalization of marijuana. :)

Oh and in case you didn’t know, Elephant presidential candidate Ron Paul basically supports its legalization. He thinks it will free more time for cops to go running after the real criminals instead of catching non-violent people who use it recreationally. Those who oppose him have begun calling him the Pot Candidate.

{ 11 comments }

08 US Elections: Who Will Make America a Better Place For You & Your Children?

by Drima on August 13, 2007

I present to you the Elephants!

http://images.libertyoutlet.com/samples/s-peace.jpg

And the Donkeys!

http://z.about.com/d/classicalmusic/1/0/m/brokebackmountain.jpg

And finally a list of all the presidential candidates with some background information on each one of them. :)

{ 9 comments }

Tom Tancredo: The Muslim World’s Best Friend

by Drima on August 8, 2007

Super genius fantastic monkey Tom Tancredo wants to bomb Mecca and Medina in retaliation for any potential future terrorist attack on America. Sure, go ahead, ignite hell and send oil prices skyrocketing. Me guessing Mr. Brilliant is trying to score a few pathetic political points. America’s best buddies, the Saudis must surely like him. Head over to Tancredo Watch and find out more wonderful facts.

{ 14 comments }

2008 US Elections: Hillary Vs Giuliani

by Drima on August 8, 2007

I’m not sure since it’s too early to tell but from how things are looking right now, I think it’s going to boil down to the 2 of them facing each other. Both of them are unique in the sense that they have the potential of appealing to voters from the opposing side. Furthermore they already have significant support from their voting bases.

Hillary is a unique Donkey due to her un-Donkey support of the Iraq war. Hence she has potential to capture some votes from the Right. Giuliani is a unique Elephant due to his un-Elephant stance on social issues like abortion. He’s pro-choice. Hence he has potential to capture some votes from the Left.

Personally, I’d like to see John McCain from the Elephant side. I like the guy but I don’t think he stands a chance to get elected anymore since he pissed off too many people in his voting base with regards to the illegal immigration issue. So yes, I’m guessing he’s pretty much “bye bye”.
Also, as much as I like Donkey Obama’s eloquent speeches, I think his inexperience is starting to show when he proposes dumb ideas such as withdrawing from Iraq and sending troops to Pakistan instead (hat tip: DB Shobrawy). Ya, sure thing, that would work. Still though, Obama has a good chance of beating Hillary.

{ 1 comment }

Who Would Drima Vote For in the ‘08 US Elections?

by Drima on June 30, 2007

I found this quiz at the Atheist Jew’s blog and spent a few minutes answering it. The following are my results:

1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100%)
2. Mitt Romney (60%)
3. Tommy Thompson (54%)
4. John McCain (50%)
5. Al Gore (48%)
6. Ron Paul (47%)
7. Tom Tancredo (47%)
8. Christopher Dodd (47%)
9. Mike Huckabee (47%)
10. Sam Brownback (47%)
11. Jim Gilmore (45%)
12. Wesley Clark (45%)
13. Barack Obama (45%)
14. John Edwards (45%)
15. Chuck Hagel (43%)
16. Duncan Hunter (43%)
17. Dennis Kucinich (41%)
18. Michael Bloomberg (41%)
19. Fred Thompson (40%)
20. Hillary Clinton (39%)
21. Joseph Biden (39%)
22. Bill Richardson (37%)
23. Rudolph Giuliani (37%)
24. Alan Augustson (36%)
25. Newt Gingrich (33%)
26. Kent McManigal (32%)
27. Mike Gravel (22%)
28. Elaine Brown (21%)

Interesting huh? I’ve never liked the idea of putting myself in a Right or Left box. It’s too confining. Center-Left to Center-Right is my opinion spectrum. But hey maybe I really am a right-leaning centrist after all (if there is such a thing). As for Romney, from what little I read about him, it seems like he’s a spineless chameleon who changes his stances every 2 seconds. At least McCain came in at 4.

Here, why don’t you give the quiz a try! :)

{ 5 comments }

The CEO Mayor: New York’s Mike Bloomberg For President?

by Drima on June 18, 2007

Me liked this article on Business Week. Maybe you will too. Bloomberg for President? New Yorkers what do you think? I don’t like Giuliani. I’d prefer to see John McCain win from the Elephant side since he’s someone I actually have respect for. Even though I don’t agree with all his views, I think he’s the best the Elephants have to offer. The rest, either I don’t know much about or I just don’t like. As for Bloomberg, I don’t much about him except for what I just read in this pro-Bloomberg article. And in case you’re wondering, from the Donkey side, I’d prefer to see Hillary. Not so sure about Obama anymore (even though he’s such a good and passionate speaker compared to boring robotic Hillary. Seriously, I’m not American and even I was moved by this, [forward to 3:20]).

Bleh, I have a headache. If only Colin Powell was running for President. Making a choice could have been a lot easier. Americans, enjoy your ‘08 elections! They’re going to be of paramount importance for the future of your country and the Middle East.

{ 4 comments }

US Sudan Envoy Andrew Natsios On Darfur: Not Genocide

by Drima on June 1, 2007

Besides Sudanese intelligence and the CIA cooperating on terrorism issues and a recent report describing Sudan as a strong partner in the war on terrorism, we have something else which I just discovered. This. Andrew Natsios, the US envoy to Sudan is basically saying there’s no more genocide in Darfur.

On one hand you’ve got Bush saying it’s genocide, and on the other you’ve got his own envoy to Sudan saying it’s not anymore. Wonderful. Mixed signals give me serious headaches.

{ 3 comments }

And Bush Smacks It With A Veto

by Drima on May 2, 2007

The inevitable happened. Me support.

First, the bill would mandate a rigid and artificial deadline for American troops to begin withdrawing from Iraq. That withdrawal could start as early as July 1, and it would have to start no later than Oct. 1, regardless of the situation on the ground.

It makes no sense to tell the enemy when you plan to start withdrawing. All the terrorists would have to do is mark their calendars and gather their strength and begin plotting how to overthrow the government and take control of the country of Iraq.

Why don’t the Donkeys get that? There could be dire consquences for both the region and America.

{ 12 comments }

Darfur: Something Effective Is Being Cooked Up

by Drima on April 16, 2007

I guess Sudan accepting UN troops is old news by now. Don’t get too excited though. I am still skeptical but not as much as I used to be when similar news were announced in the past. I’m only slightly skeptical this time. Maybe this slight skepticism exists in me due to fear… the fear of making an emotional investment only to end up feeling bitter disappointment later on. Even with this slight skepticism, this time I don’t think the Sudanese government (or Omar al-Bashir’s NCP to be more specific) is trying the same old trick of buying more time by saying “yes, no problemo” only to later change their minds and say “whops, sorry but…”

Lately we’ve been witnessing a real push to pressure Sudan and also things that indicate the high possibility of a real push occuring behind the scenes. Firstly, the US of A (whom I thank for playing a vital role in ending the bloody 20 year old Sudanese North-South civil war) indicated that it will seriously consider building up the capacity of the SPLM’s army (aka SPLA) as part of Plan B, something which will present a real threat to the northern NCP. Secondly, the “Genocide Olympics” movement seems to be gaining momentum, something which has the potential to cause a real headache for China. Thirdly, during the recent Arab League Summit, Saudi Arabia announced that it was working on convincing Sudan to accept the UN force in Darfur. It looks like they weren’t lying and that they actually have something to do with the recent Sudanese acceptance/”acceptance”. Fourthly the Sudan divestment campaign is also gaining momentum in America. Moreover new sanctions is something Sudan defintely doesn’t want. Believe me when I say this, the NCP doesn’t want bad relations with America. On the contrary, what they want (and what I myself and many Sudanese want too) is for Sudan to be removed from the terrorism sponsoring states list, lifting of sanctions and normalization of relations. This is just a simple example of what I mean and what peope hoped the North-South peace agreement would achieve. Fifthly, when Negroponte himself and not some small time lousy diplomat goes all the way to Khartoum to discuss Darfur, something is defintely cooking. Sixthly, the new alliances forming in Darfur against the government might be a factor. I’m not so sure about this one as I haven’t really read much about it.

The above mentioned points are just some of the developments I’ve been reading about. The rhetoric in various cases isn’t as vague as before. Now, even if this acceptance is 100% genuine, I strongly believe it’s only an acceptance of phase 2 which would only require allowing 3000 UN troops into Darfur. Accepting phase 3 will be the killer that the NCP would hate as it would mean allowing 20,000 UN troops into Darfur. 3000 troops with consent from Khartoum is a good start.

On another note though, I’ve got to say that Bush has been really patient with Omer al-Bashir all along. Hell, the man even offered to meet al-Bashir personally. What would have Bill Clinton done if he was still president? Bomb more pharmaceutical factories, ops I mean highly crazy super dangerous chemical weapons production facilities? In regards to Sudan, the Elephant response has been better than the Donkey response during Clinton’s time. No? *Stones, tomatoes and eggs flying towards Drima*.

UPDATE: An article by the CMS states points similar to mine:

International pressure from the United Nations, Arab leaders, and the United States played a role in Sudan’s concession this week to allow 3,000 UN peacekeepers into the country’s troubled Darfur region.

So, apparently, did the image concerns of China – both one of Sudan’s biggest commercial partners and an increasingly outgoing international power – as it prepares to host the 2008 Summer Olympics.

…For some observers, Sudan’s decision reflects China’s growing pressure on Khartoum to respond to growing pressures from the international community.

“It shows that one thing is more important to the Chinese than their access to Sudan’s oil, and that’s the success of their Olympic Games,” said actress and Darfur activist Mia Farrow in comments to the Associated Press.

And as usual, Alex De Waal states the obvious.

De Waal says the janjaweed, the pro-government Arab militia terrorizing the Darfur population, will never be disarmed by peacekeepers – that will take an internal Sudanese political solution.

De Waal says the danger of Sudan’s latest agreement is that what he calls the “more-has-to-be-done crowd” will be enthralled by it, instead of looking for more viable solutions.

“It’s not ‘we need to do more,’ ” he says, “but at this point we need to rethink and say ‘maybe we need to do things differently.’ “

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Alex De Waal is one of the few people being quoted in the Western main stream media who actually knows the real facts and understands the situation well enough.

{ 23 comments }

300!!

by Drima on March 30, 2007

300 Movie Poster

The movie is da shyte! It’s been a really long time since I’ve watched a movie that I enjoyed THIS much. It’s sort of a combination of LOTR and Gladiator except 300 has a lot more blood. And I mean A LOT more blood! Yummy! In terms of special effects I think the movie has set a new standard the same way The Matrix did about a decade ago. The casting is superb and the graphic effects are much and I mean MUCH cooler than anything I’ve seen in any movie before. 300 is absolutely ENTERTAINING!

The story and the hidden political message were pretty interesting too. Okay, fine so maybe there was no such thing as a hidden political message but who cares, let’s pretend there is one just for the fun of it. Here’s what I thought:

Leonidas = Bush

Xerxes = Ahmadinejad

The Spartans who opposed Leonidas going to war = Donkeys ie. “unpatriotic traitors”.

Leonidas supporters = Elephants

Watch the movie and you’ll know what I mean. It’s pretty obvious in my opinion. On a serious note though, Persians were portrayed in a negative way which made them look like a bunch of smelly barbarians. That wasn’t a nice thing to do, but then again, the movie is not based on accurate historical facts. Instead it can be considered mostly fiction. Most of my Iranian friends who watched it, enjoyed it. A few told me they vehemently reject the “filthy American propaganda” and are not going to watch the movie.

But I know I will… AGAIN!

{ 4 comments }

House OKs Timetable For Troops In Iraq & Iran Seizes 15 British Sailors

by Drima on March 23, 2007

Looooooooovely!!!

{ 2 comments }