From the monthly archives:

February 2009

The Crocodile-Infested River of Blasphemy

by Drima on February 27, 2009

What’s up everyone, I’m back with a little thought experiment I’d like to share with you. I’m doing it with a new format that I’ve been wanting to try out lately, because it allows me to share more in less time. Plus, you don’t have to end up reading a gigantic long post.

Video has its advantages, but please excuse me if my voice sounds a little weird. I recorded the whole thing right after waking up. Alrighty then, let’s begin. Watch the video below. :)

I’ll be doing a follow-up post update after this, but for now, who would you rather trust more? X or Y?

UPDATE: Many of the first 20 comments contain no direct answer to the main question - whether the pick is Mr. X or Mr. Y.

That’s partially due to a blunder on my part for not making the thought experiment coherent enough, so I don’t blame those of you who who over-analyzed the story and came up with hilarious non-answers. ;)

For example, I didn’t have a particular reason for stating the one day time period it took both Mr. X and Mr. Y to finish their bridges. The stated short time period wasn’t meant to sound like some miraculous feat, but a number of you perceived it as such, which was quite intriguing. Regarding Harvard apparently not offering civil engineering courses, well, it wasn’t meant to cast doubt on Mr. X’s genuine honesty.

Both Mr. X and Mr. Y are good honest men. It’s just that the basis of their bridge building and design efforts are different.

All in all, the feedback was ultimately good because it’s going to help me refine this thought experiment and make it more coherent. It also helps me prepare the ground to move forward with certain related topics I want to begin discussing. More importantly, if we only take into account the answers that did make a clear pick between X or Y, then we have an obvious winner.

Here are the answers (they are limited to ones from the first 20 comments in this post and the first six comments posted over at YouTube):

Answers from the Blog Post

Zoxuf - “I would go with Mr. X because his method of bridge building has been proven to be reliable in the past while Y’s method has not yet been proven.”

Andrew Brehm - “I’ll have to agree with Zoxuf… I’d trust Mr. X more.”

Elizabeth - “I agree with Andrew. I believe in G-d, but I can’t be sure that Mr. Y actually was inspired by G-d. I’ll pick Mr. X’s bridge.”

Optimist - “I like intuitions and convictions, but only when they are my own, thereby making it hard to trust Mr. Y’s bridge… Honestly, trusting a person with conviction and intuition seems romantic, but in this case it’s also flirting with death. I don’t like crocodiles. So Harvard grad’s bridge it is!”

lirun - “i would trust mr x.. assuming i dont need to double guess his credentials”

Amjad - “I would trust Mr. Y more, because Mr. X is a big fat liar! Harvard University does NOT offer Civil Engineering degrees, so Mr.X is a liar! :P”

Answers from YouTube

yaeli13 - “Yikes, I might rather build my own boat. I’d probably go with Mr. X though.”

StephenM02 - “mr. x”

… and the score is (drumroll)

  • Total clear picks: 8
  • Picks favoring Mr. X: 7
  • Picks favoring Mr. Y: 1

Mr. X wins.

The results don’t surprise me. Do they surprise you?

To some of you, this might just be a simple fun silly thought experiment, but to me, it’s much deeper than that. The answers this experiment generates are precisely the kind that have huge political and social consequences on everyday life.

I trust in reason, and it seems like most of you who gave an answer do too. Whereas when it comes to faith, I only revere and respect the uplifting kind in non-rational and non-empirical matters, which cannot be proven or dis-proven, but I will not be dogmatically bound to it.

More in an upcoming post.

{ 60 comments }

Further Musings on the ICC Warrant

by Drima on February 21, 2009

It’s been seven months since news broke out about the ICC’s pursuit of an arrest warrant for Sudanese dictator Omar al-Bashir, charging him with genocide and war crimes against humanity, a move that brought about entertaining Sudanese reactions.

bashirarrested

Seven months, and it seems to me that there are some who can hardly wait for the issuance of this arrest warrant as if it’s some kind of magical solution that’s going to bring peace and stability to Darfur.

[click to continue...]

{ 23 comments }

RIP Tayeb Saleh (1929 - 2009)

by Drima on February 21, 2009

tayeb-salih From Sudanese Optimist’s blog:

Sudan has lost a dear citizen, who has contributed tremendously to Sudanese and Arabic literature. His most acclaimed work is the 1966 novel “Season of Migration to the North.” The novel was, at one point, banned in Sudan for its inclusion of sexual imagery, yet it was declared “the most important Arabic novel of the 20th century” by the Syrian-based Arab Literary Academy in Damascus.

More here at this BBC article. Amira also hammered out an awesome roundup over at Global Voices.

RIP Tayeb Saleh, you will be missed.

{ 5 comments }

Educating the American Ignoramuses

by Drima on February 15, 2009

Americans are NOT stupid. That’s the sarcastic title of the video below. Well, after watching it, it seems to me that clearly a good deal are. Seriously, this is super hilarious. I guess too many of them are busy watching American Idol and the NFL instead of paying a little attention to CNN or something.

Phew! Thank goodness you’ve got many informed Americans engaged in the political process. Can’t be having those ignoramuses as the only voters. It would be a disaster. Can we unleash a Jihad for reason to enlighten those people, please?

Dear American readers, please don’t hate me for posting this. You know I love you guys! :P

Enjoy watching - and laughing - as I untangle myself from all the work I’m tied up in at the moment. Drima will be back soon.

{ 74 comments }

We’re All Heretics

by Drima on February 7, 2009

Let’s face it. Every single one of us is a heretic.

Heretic - a person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the established church.

I repeat.

Everyone of us is a heretic, has been and will continue to be during those certain short “pesky” secretive moments of internal unvoiced doubt.

That’s right, we’re all heretics.

You, me, your mother, your father, your siblings, your loved ones, your lovers, your haters, your boss, your co-workers, your classmates…

… Everyone.

Even the most religious of the religious have their moments of doubt.

It’s only natural that we question, but the difference between the “evil” fierce heretics (the minority if I may add) and the tolerated safe ones simply lies in the intensity of questioning - the vocal kind, that is expressed publicly of course.

The kind that can bring down age-old belief systems. upon which much is based on in our society, hence the sometimes rather understandable paranoia and staunch religiously-sanctioned defense of orthodoxy.

Even when that very orthodoxy that’s being defended is in numerous ways clearly rotten, broken, and utterly despicable. And I’m not just talking about numerous aspects of religious orthodoxy here, but also the secular kind like communism and cultural kind like coerced arranged marriage.

So, now that I’ve made my point clear in a brief fashion, what do you sometimes doubt? What generally accepted sacred thing have you quietly and secretly been questioning within your mind lately?

Be honest with yourself. There’s always something lurking right beneath the surface.

And now with the emancipating miracles of Web 2.0 technologies and the new media revolution, you can speak about it freely without the filter of a censoring editor or a money-hungry politically correct publisher. So, speak it, because at the end of the day…

… we’re all heretics.

{ 70 comments }

The Reboot

by Drima on February 1, 2009

They say curiosity killed the cat. Now while I don’t know if that’s true, I do know one thing for sure. It did kill a good deal of ignorance in my head and gave me seriously torturous headaches along the way, but all of this has been a blessing in disguise.

Truth be told, now, after the dust has settled, I’ve never felt happier or more liberated mentally. There’s a lot I want to say now that this reboot is officially done and complete.

And what better way is there to start the new direction of this blog than to explain the following taken from my, ehm, Bio of Awesomeness.

Ex-Traditionalist Muslim, Turned Re-Awakened Sufi Lover and Rationalist Agnostic Free Thinker. Social Media Consultant to NY Times Best-Selling Authors. Author of Upcoming “Heretical” Book on Islam and New Media. Belief Systems Junkie. Afro-Arab Libertarian Music Freak. Vehemently Anti-Islamist. Loud and Drop Dead Gorgeous. The High Priest of Mischievous “Blasphemy.” Read on and Have Your Brain Spun. You’ve Been Warned!

I believe for old time readers who’ve known me and witnessed my evolution from the start, the above might be puzzling or even outright shocking.

Believe me, I would have never - ever - imagined ending up with my current frame of mind when I wrote my first blog post in April 2006. But the pursuit of one’s passion and ideas for their own sake, it seems, can lead one down unexpected rabbit holes.

It’s hard for me to remember precisely when and which triggers caused what. However, there are three distinct phases I went through that brought me to where I am today. Below, I share them briefly.

Phase 1 - Blogging Darfur (and the Rude Awakening)

As some of you know, what mainly pushed me to start blogging was my disappointment at the absence of any Sudanese bloggers when I stumbled upon this gold mine called blogosphere. Pretty much, all countries in the region around Sudan had their political blog communities, but not Sudan itself. I elaborate a little on that in this interview which I did very recently:

… there were no Sudanese bloggers to be found anywhere at the time, at least not any that I’ve heard of even after so much searching. I thought it was a shame because people needed to hear about Darfur first and foremost, from Sudanese themselves.

I was ticked off by this, but then realized I was being a hypocritical idiot for bitching and whining about this whole ordeal. “Screw it,” I thought to myself. “Just go ahead and be the ‘first’ Sudanese blogger. At least you’ll have first mover advantage, and you can try what’s possible to correct all the misconceptions surrounding the Darfur conflict,” the voice in my head continued.

And so it all began.

From 20 daily visitors, to 35, 100, 400 and eventually a few thousand. I blogged mainly about Sudan and the readership grew, but something else also happened.

I was confronted by some difficult truths I had not known. Many were related to political matters and things like secularism, democracy, US foreign policy and the Jewish people, which I also began blogging more about.

It was a rude awakening.

Phase 2 - The Political Confrontation (and the Convergence)

I began confronting the glaring political flashes that shook my worldview, unaware at the time that I was avoiding much of the religious ones.

Again, slowly but surely, the liberating evolution continued.

At the time, I was also approaching my final year in university, and I had to choose a major, so I picked one related to social media, a choice that was most certainly influenced by my addiction to blogging and the internet.

Moreover, when the time came, I also chose the subject of blogging as a means of knowledge sharing within organizational contexts for my final year project.

Needless to say, both internal and external examiners were so impressed with what I came up with and the empirical evidence which backed it up, that my project was selected as the best in my entire group, and I was handpicked to present my findings at an international conference.

It was a fun good time, because an exciting convergence began happening in my head.

You see, an obstacle I faced during my research was answering the question of how one can manage knowledge in an organization if one can’t even define what knowledge is in the first place.

Moreover, like Peter Drucker said, “if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”

So, I looked around and found case studies to resolve my challenge along with other stuff, but one thing in particular stood out - epistemology, the philosophy of knowledge. It fell from my the sky right smack on my head at a super relevant time in which I was struggling with finding that ever elusive “Truth.”

Finally, I had a way of assessing the crazy, diverse opinions in the blogosphere in a way that was more objective than anything I’ve ever known. Finally, I had a way of making sense of tiring and circular religious discussions, which was based on a rational intellectually honest framework. Finally, it “all” began converging together.

The discussions I regularly have with my dad, a Professor who teaches sociology. The books I consumed about philosophy, the social construction of knowledge, marketing, social psychology, the democratization of knowledge and publishing powered by the revolution of online new media, democracy, human rights, faith Vs reason, moral relativism.

You name it.

It all started converging together, and it was absolutely orgasmic, but there was still one problem.

Phase 3 - The Religious Confrontation (and the Divergence)

By early 2008, I was quite satisfied with the conclusions I’ve reached in regards to political matters. What remained were the religious questions I had been dismissing for too long but which were now staring me in the face.

I feared them, because facing them with intellectual honesty meant entertaining the possibility that what I was taught growing up could be wrong. Being wrong or right about things like US foreign policy or constitutionalism is not the kind of thing that can have a huge impact on one’s life. But entertaining the idea that one’s religious beliefs could be wrong has huge consequences in virtually all aspects of one’s life, if one does indeed discover one is wrong.

There was no running away.

I had to confront the religious questions, and trust me. It was not easy. In fact, psychologically speaking, it was one of the most difficult periods I’ve ever had to endure in my entire life. Long story short, I now have happily diverged away from the broken, dry, and archaic traditionalist approach to Islam. (I like liberal Muslim theologians better, because they value reason more).

Also by early 2008, I had already decided that I had so much bottled up inside of me, I simply needed to get it out, and so the idea for my book was born.

Time passed by, I got busier and as a result this blog suffered, but I gained a lot in the process. I managed to spend ample time away from excessively and aimlessly swimming throughout the blogosphere and read lots of diversely opinionated books on Islam, philosophy, mysticism and atheism instead. From Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd and Reza Aslan to Ibn Warraq, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens.

It’s been good torturous fun for my head.

And it’s going to be even way more fun once I start revealing to you what I’ve digested and synthesized. Lots of things on the way people, and I look forward to tearing down into pieces certain religious ideas and mounting a serious “heretical” rational challenge to them.

On a related note, I’ve also become deeply fascinated - not to mention extremely disturbed - by what goes on in jihadist forums on the internet. I began visiting them out of a desire to have some relevant research material for my book.

Seriously, some of these forums are disturbing, the kind of disturbing that won’t make you sleep so peacefully at night.

Lastly, in 2008, I also graduated university and ditched lucrative job offers from Fortune 500 companies, to join instead an awesome company that works with some of the biggest best-selling authors in the entire world.

After undergoing the relevant company-sponsored training, I found myself doing social media consulting directly with some of these best-selling authors or their employees and building good relationships with them. Thanks to my experience observing the psychological dynamics in the blogosphere, I picked up the necessary knowledge fast and intuitively, and rose to become a specialist at the field.

And as all of that happened, this blog continued suffering, and didn’t receive the attention it deserved. Heck, I never even bothered implementing for this very online initiative of mine all the knowledge I taught to my clients, which bugged the crap out of me. This will no longer be the case, and that’s why this reboot was necessary.

Drima has a lot on his mind that he wants to speak and expertise he needs to implement here, and he shall begin doing so more frequently.

So, what now?

Well, there it is all above in a nutshell. Blogging literally redefined me and the path I’ve chosen to take in life. From the major I chose in university, to my selected career path, and my evolved worldview, blogging here in this very space has been hugely responsible for that….

… and I have you the readers and fellow bloggers to thank. I would also like to give a special thank you to Esra’a from MideastYouth and Tim from Freedoms Zone for all the technical behind the scenes help.

Server side hosting and programming issues aren’t really my strong points, but I learned a lot of cool techie things during the transition period.

Anyways, stick around to learn more about my upcoming book, and stay tuned for what’s to come: Heresy in all its beautiful progressive glory. ;)

And please, do always know that whenever you read something which may offend you, that I’m not being offensive on purpose. That is not my intention. Mine is to simply provoke interesting discussions and speak my own “heretical” thoughts. And as I do that, I’m open to learning from yours.

Less fear. Less unexamined faith. More reason.

Have a good day everyone!

Sincerely,
Drima Abu Hamdan Ibn Zandaqa - liberated blogger and agnostic Sufi mystic

{ 59 comments }