Al-Qaeda Promises War in Darfur

Posted on September 20, 2007
Filed Under Evil Terrorists, Darfur |

Oh dear.

CAIRO, Egypt - Osama bin Laden will release a new message soon declaring war on Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, al-Qaida announced Thursday.

… Speakers in the video promised more fighting in Afghanistan, North Africa and Sudan’s Darfur region.

Why isn’t this stinking butcher named Bin Laden dead yet? Someone please drop a bomb on his head. Pretty please with a cherry on top.

Comments

21 Responses to “Al-Qaeda Promises War in Darfur”

  1. Roman Kalik on September 20th, 2007 1:42 pm

    So, *this* is the long awaited Arab attention to Darfur? Not exactly what folks had in mind, I think.

    Not a good development.

  2. Andrew Brehm on September 20th, 2007 2:45 pm

    What did you expect?

    Most Arab organisations that claim to fight oppression and defend good Muslims only become active when they think that there is not enough violence in a given region.

  3. aaron on September 20th, 2007 3:15 pm

    But what would Bush do without his boogie man to scare everyone? Six years later and notice how he isn’t in the news any more… they just pull him out of their hats at opportune times to remind people that WE ARE FIGHTING A WAR ON TERROR

    Whatever the fuck that means.

  4. Don Cox on September 20th, 2007 3:30 pm

    “Whatever the fuck that means.”

    It means capturing or killing people who explode bombs in streets, markets, cafes, trains, schools, and other places full of civilians, in order to gain power by terrifying the population. That includes ETA, and (in the past) anarchists; but most of the current terrorists are in one or other Islamic jihadist group.

    So you could simplify it by saying it is mainly a war against violent Islamic jihad.

  5. Roman Kalik on September 20th, 2007 3:35 pm

    Aaron… Bin-Laden and Co. aren’t anyone’s bogeyman. They exist, with an agenda of their very own. Will ignoring them make them go away? Or the dozens of groups that follow the same core ideology across the Islamic states?

  6. Dalu on September 20th, 2007 6:01 pm

    Why isn’t this stinking butcher named Bin Laden dead yet? Someone please drop a bomb on his head. Pretty please with a cherry on top.”

    Working on it.

  7. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 8:35 am

    Let’s see.

    Al Qaeda kill Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. Then they decide to declare war on Pakistan. And now they are considering murdering more Muslims in Darfur.

    It seems to me like proposing to attack non-Muslims would be a very dangerous task at an Al Qaeda meeting. Bin Laden seems to be very strict about selecting only Muslims as targets.

    (I know it’s not necessity that makes him choose Muslims. He is on the side of his god, after all. And his god is all-powerful and everything. So he COULD attack whomever he wants. And he happens to attack Muslims, mostly.)

  8. Don Cox on September 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    “And he happens to attack Muslims, mostly.”

    For any fanatic, the most hated enemy is the one with views near to his own. The worst of all is the former ally.

    Look at all the killing of Marxists by Marxists.

  9. Roman Kalik on September 21st, 2007 11:09 am

    You have a point, Don Cox. The Stalinists hated the Trotskytes more than they hated Capitalists, for instance. If the Capitalists were just an enemy, other Socialists or Communists were a possible contradiction of their own particular path.

    Bin-Laden’s most hated and feared enemy is Muslims who don’t think like him, because his “Islam” does not allow their existence. They are a contradiction to his beliefs, and so they must be, in his eyes, converted or cleansed.

  10. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 11:54 am

    The Muslims in the countries Bin Laden chooses for his attacks are actually among the most supportive of his version of “Islam”.

    I think it just turned out that if you train people to be evil so you can use them as soldiers, they are evil first, and your soldiers second.

    It’s a death cult.

    Interesting speach:

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/gabriel.asp

    (Not directly related to the above, but telling.)

  11. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 12:03 pm

    Another unrelated link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_kippur

    Says:

    “Muslim connection”
    […]
    “Moses was saved from the impeding Pharaoh’s army”

    Compare with:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War

    “The war began with a surprise joint attack by Egypt and Syria on the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur.”

    Drima, do Muslims generally realise the irony here described?

  12. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 12:07 pm

    The Stalinists happily murdered whomever they could. Their victims didn’t have to be enemies or former friends. They just had to be numbers.

    The reason, I think, Stalin murdered more Russians and others sympathetic to communism than capitalists was because he had no power over the capitalists. To a tyrant, the word “enemy” is defined as “whomever I can kill”.

  13. DZA on September 21st, 2007 1:57 pm

    lol
    they do drop bombs, but on poor afghanis heads..
    so bin laden is coming to sudan huh?
    i can picture the scenario.. bin laden’s supporters gonna bomb churches, christian southerners gonna burn mosques .. poof, great civil war
    perfect divide and conquer
    but who are bin laden’s supporters? united states again? that’d be rightous

  14. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 2:34 pm

    DZA,

    Can you rephrase your comment? It doesn’t seem to make sense at all.

  15. Spanish Pundit » Blog Archive » Al Qaida llama a «limpiar el Magreb islámico de los hijos de España y Francia» on September 21st, 2007 2:36 pm

    […] bloguero sudanés de Sudanese Thinker, cuando se enteró de la amenaza de Bin Laden, escribió en su blog: “Por qué este oloriento asesino llamado Bin Laden no está muerto ya? Por favor que alguien […]

  16. Roman Kalik on September 21st, 2007 2:48 pm

    *shakes head* DZA, you guys in Sudan have kept yourselves divided for decades now, and all of a sudden an outside Evil Imperialist Crusader is what’s going to divide you? Sheesh.

    And it’s good to see that you still believe in conspiracy theories. Really, it is. The enterntainment value alone is worth it.

  17. Andrew Brehm on September 21st, 2007 3:06 pm

    Roman,

    You actually understood him? He didn’t make a lot of sense to me, didn’t know whether he really wanted to write that the US are “again” the supporters of Bin Laden and that Christians in Sudan are known for burning down mosques…

    I think it will take another while for some to accept the bitter truth: it is self-proclaimed Muslims who attack other Muslims. The rest of the world would just be watching if there wasn’t the odd attack on a Christian country and the weird obsession with destroying Israel (as if driving the Jews out of Muslims countries doesn’t satisfy the no-Jew requirement).

  18. Nomad on September 21st, 2007 8:08 pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_Organization_in_the_Islamic_Maghreb

    actually, this organisation is killing in Algeria, and projects to spread its madness in Sahel and Darfur ; a few hours ago a terrorist attack occured in Alger-east, 9 woundeds among them, 1 Italian, 2 Frenchs 6 Algerians ;

    one could say they have Lybian Warrior discourse when he was still adolescent : they refer to the lost Andaloucia…and want to kill the crusaders

  19. elgreco on September 22nd, 2007 9:25 pm

    i just discover your blog
    congratulation

    the first blog from sudan….and i hope to visit your contry one day

  20. Ahmad al-Safawi on September 29th, 2007 1:32 pm

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pwdjVh202F0 Sha3ban 3abdera7eems song for Darfur hehe…

    And hey: Please stop linking Al Qaida’s actions to an “Arab invention”. It is not.

  21. Drima on September 29th, 2007 3:47 pm

    Ahmad, LOL indeed :)

    Sha3ban is one funny ignorant retard.

Leave a Reply