The bastard will get what he deserved. YES!!
BUT… by hanging ONLY!
This guy at minimum deserves death by shooting squad. They should skin him alive, chop his genitals into pieces, spill acid on him, hang him by his legs, whip him a million times and finally stick a bullet into his head. Okay that’s harsh. Is it? Bleh whatever but you get the idea.
I bet every single Arab dictator now is shaking in his throne. On the other hand I’m sure Britain/America hating folks are going to do their best to downplay this latest news. Screw them. This moment and the day he gets executed are destined to go down in history as some of the most defining moments of the 21st century. Down with the filthy dictators in every corner of the globe. May freedom and justice prevail everywhere! Amen.
SudaneseThinker
SudaneseThinker
{ 4 trackbacks }
{ 23 comments… read them below or add one }
From what I’ve heard death by firing squad is only for condemned soldiers in Iraq. Hanging is the penalty for common civilian murderers. Saddam has said that he wanted a soldier’s execution and that has been denied. The penalty of hanging is an additional insult to the monster known as Saddam Hussein.
You bet it will be a defining moment!!! More please!!!
“I bet every single Arab dictator now is shaking in his throne.”
Oh yeah. I’ll bet the King of Saudi Arabia is just shitting himself with terror at what his ole US allies will do next.
Keep the champaigne on ice until the man’s swinging in the breeze. I wouldn’t put it past the American Left or somesuch bunch of traitors to spring him free before the execution.
*scanning the horizing for psychotic, delusional dykes with machineguns and Che Guevara T-shirts*
It would be better to keep him alive, but open to the families of his victims, every day, hearing their opinions, no holidays, for his natural. the cunt.
Since he wants firing squad, let’s give him that but before we do, let us first skin him, chop off his balls, fry them, make him eat them, spill acid on him and THEN put him infront of the firing squad.
Seriously, people - he ain’t dead ’till he’s dead. Don’t get your hopes up.
Raccoon, I know the appeals might take a long time but for now it’s really fun fantasizing this asshole’s death. The fact that the verdict was announced and the risk taken in the face of increasing violence says a lot… at least to me it does.
Well, Saddam was senntenced to death for killing a thousand Iraqis in Dujail. But who should’ be sentenced to death also for killing 600,000 Iraqies since 2003?
ur happy for a muslim death, happy for kafir life?
But who should’ be sentenced to death also for killing 600,000 Iraqies since 2003?
kufar killing us moslems
Drima - yeah, it’s a positive step. I hope
Riyadhawi - the answer is “you”. Since the absolute majority of these people (even taking the pulled-out-of-the-ass number) died because of the implacable stupidity of Islamists, we can only bame said stupidity.
Since you appear to be infliced with the said malaise, I find you guilty in the matter of the deaths of 600,000 Iraqis AND well over 1,000,000,000 people who died tragically all over the world in the past few hundred thousand years.
You are hereby condemned to death by stupidity. So please, charge the nearest thick wall headfirst, as fast as you can, and improve the human gene pool.
Al-Iraqi -
You have also been charged, tried and convicted same as Riyadhawi. Please execute the same sentence on yourself. Commit suicide - improve the future of humankind!
Am I the only person left who’s against capital punishment, _even_ for a guy like SH ? I tend to agree w/Dave Evans.
And yes, I’m a hopeless idealist, I know, I just won’t have him be a martyr
HH - his death cannot make anything worse, but can make things better. Some people need killin’, unfortunately.
Frankly, I would much rather have had ol’ Saddam “re-educated” 1984-style and used him for propaganda purposes.
Or done something extremely humiliating to him - like, say, grafting his head unto a pig and making him an exhibit in Baghdad.
Or, say, tying him spread-eagled in a public square somewhere in Kurdistan, with the crowd being invited to do whatever they want to him.
The point here is not revenge or justice - the first is petty and the second illusory - but rather prevention of similar activities in the future.
As I have said before (and will say again) - if all captured terrorists and corpses of terrorists would have been crusified alongside the main roads of Iraq with their heads and hearts sewn into raw pigskin sacks, terroristm in Iraq would have stopped a long, long time ago. And it would have been greatly reduced everywhere else.
The problem is that our effiminate, eunuch post-modern joke of a society just doesn’t have the stones to do what needs to be done. Thus people die. Thus Europe is rapidly slipping away. Thus hyper-masculine Islamonazi cults and societies are taking hold, growing, expanding… and winning.
Remeber why Rome fell. And remember Magadha. History repeats itself because humans are too stupid to remember it.
“But who should’ be sentenced to death also for killing 600,000 Iraqies since 2003? ”
Riyadhawi and Al Iraqi, listen Bush is a dickhead for the mismanagement of the war in Iraq and the coalition troops should do a better job to maintain order but are you seriously seriously going to blame him for killing “600,000″???!!!
“kufar killing us moslems”
Yes, maybe you might be right BUT the huge bulk of it is Muslims killing Muslims. Can you deny that?? Can you???!!!
Listen guys I haven’t been a happy fan of the Iraq war but is there anything wrong with being a fan of this death sentence?? Are YOU not happy that Saddam will be put to death? Your attitudes are just so… “lovely”. Oh well. Wooohooo death to Saddam!!!
First off, about the 600,000 number: Read Iraq Body Count’s comments. Anything remotely close to the claimed 600,000 figure would have had massive implications that simply have not happened.
Secondly, most of the Iraqi deaths that have occurred since the end of the invasion itself have occurred when one Iraqi death squad/criminal gang/personal army murdered members of other sects or members of the same sect who dared to oppose them politically. So Muqtada al-Sadr, Sunni Baath leaders and Sunni takfiris whom you probably support are the ones who should be tried for these kinds of crimes. Will you support their arrest and trial? Great!
Thirdly, an invasion is, strangely enough, not a war crime. Neither Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1991, nor the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 are war crimes; they are simply wars. Saddam IS guilty many times over of war crimes and crimes against humanity, e.g. the Anfal campaign against the Kurds, the attempted genocide of the marsh Arabs, the use of poison gas against Iranian soldiers, the use of civilian human shields (Iraqi and otherwise) in war, and many other high-profile, very well-known crimes. By now, anyone who denies that Saddam and his junta committed crimes against humanity is either deeply delusional or a pathalogical liar. Sadly, there are a lot of people like that running around.
Fourthly, to everyone, if Iraqi law says that Saddam must hang, then he must hang. Saddam always saw himself as being above the law; he ruled by personal whim. But the reason there is a trial in the first place — he could always have been dragged out into the public square, denounced and lynched instead — is that the new government is trying to create a country ruled by laws instead of by the whims of tyrants. So no, Saddam doesn’t get to choose his punishment. He should die as required by the law. If someone wants to change the law and let him die by firing squad, they can always approach the Iraqi parliament. Otherwise, his sentence should be legal, not a matter of whim.
1,2,3 nicely said Zvi
The Raccoon
The “stupidity” is very clear when you re-read your comment! Your disagreement with what I said does not jusfity your unrespected comment. You can clearify your argument in a better and respected way.
BTW, I am not with Saddam nor With the Americans
jusfity = justify
Riyadhawi -
Yeah, I got a bit nasty. Please accept my apology for lashing out at you. It’s just that such inane talking points, based on baseless information (often spread by libelous and horribly biased media) often crop up as the usual attempt to defend/justify terrorists, tyrants and others of such ilk. And I somewhat tired of it - the world is going to hell in a handbasket, and people push it along by believing various lies just because they fit their pointless, nacrissistic agenda. See Al-Iraqi for case in point.
Basically, Zvi has made my argument splendidly.
And BTW - I am with the Iraqis. If the Iraqi people manage to actually get a functioning democracy, this will be the beginning of the end for the horror that we know as Middle East. Kurdistan gives me hope in this. And since Americans are going to great lengths to help Iraq become a free and prosperous demoracy, I support the Americans in this.
Justice served!!!
Hey, Drima, you’re creeping me out.Whatsup with all ” the cut his genitals, spill acid”.No, bro, plz don’t stoop to his level,loool.
“bet every single Arab dictator now is shaking in his throne”
Yea, that’s what I first thought when I heard the verdict. The Arab dictators must be squirming in their seats now.Let Saddam’s punishment be a reminder that ” what you do will always come back to you”
It is remarkable that Saddam has been sentenced for a crime he committed in 1982, at a time when the USA was more than eager to provide support to Saddam Hussein’s regime and was complicit in some of his crimes. As usual, this fact has not even been mentioned by our amnesiac media. Donald Rumsfeld, the incarnation of this administration’s moral bankruptcy, went to Baghdad shaking hands with Saddam, on December 20, 1983 (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/).
At that time, Rumsfeld knew that Saddam was a dangerous dictator (contrary to 2003, when he wasn’t dangerous any more). He knew about the 1982 massacre that has now been recognized as a “crime against humanity”. Donald Rumsfeld knew that Saddam had ordered the use of chemical weapons against Iran in breach of the Geneva conventions (contrary to 2003, when Rumsfeld knew exactly that there were no chemical weapons). And he went to Baghdad in 1983, shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, offering him the support of the United States. That’s the story that will be told in the history book.
S’right, Piglet. It’s the Evil Zionist Crusaders of the Imperialistic Amerikkka picking on poor Saddam just because he’s a Muslim.
Oh, and Bush lied, too. So that people can die, because he’s Evil. NM the fact that Saddam was months away from a nuke.
Leave a Comment