Some Will Call it Part of the Conspiracy
Posted on September 27, 2006
Filed Under General Thoughts |
… I call it good news and a victory. Congress OKs sanctions on Sudan over Darfur.
Comments
3 Responses to “Some Will Call it Part of the Conspiracy”
Leave a Reply
-
The Sudanese Thinker
A sociopolitical blog on Sudan, the “crazy” Middle East, Africa, the United States, Islam and new media.
-
-
-
Ads
-
Blogroll
1- Islam
2- Sudanese News
3- Friends of Sudan
4- Sudanese Bloggers
- AK
- Amjad
- Aperadosoni
- Ayman ElKhidir
- Black Dahlia
- Black Gay Arab
- Black Kush
- Daana Lost In Translation
- Drastic Hypothesis
- Eman J
- Fluent-Sudani
- Harith's Space!
- Hashim Arbaji
- Hipster
- Ibrahim Mamoun
- Jah Guide
- John Akec
- Kizzie
- Konyokonyo Clinic
- Mimz
- Mr. Man
- Muhanned: Life in Sudan
- Path2Hope
- Precious
- Rara Avis's Realm
- Sudan Ease
- Sudan Fairytale
- Sudanese Nectar
- Sudanese Returnee
- Sudani4eva
- The Sudanese American
- Zoulcolmx
- Zoya
5- Sudanese Stuff
6- Fun Reads
7- Middle East Blogs
8- Blogs on Africa
9- Muslims: Apostates & Converts
The Vast Spectrum
- Ali Eteraz (USA/Pakistan)
- DailyKos (Giant of the American Left)
- Drewcatt (USA/Jamaica)
- Finnpundit (Finland)
- Halalhippie (Denmark)
- Hyscience (USA)
- Irshad Manji
- Israpundit (Israel)
- Jewels in the Jungle (USA)
- KABOBfest (USA)
- Leauki (Ireland)
- LGF (Giant of the American Right)
- Myrtus (USA)
- Salah Al-Dien (USA/Palestine)
- Sigmund, Carl & Alfred (USA)
- Tell It Like It Is (USA)
- The Anchoress (USA)
- The Atheist Jew (Canada)
- The Worldly
- Tom Paine (USA)
-
Categories
-
Recently Written
- Interesting Comment About Sudanese Jews
- Jailed Egyptian Blogger Being Abused
- If Obama or McCain Suffer from Deadly Diarrhea
- And America’s VPs Have Finally Been Selected
- Left-Wing Western Idealists for Darfur
- How Sudan Smacked the Evil Jews Twice in the Face Thanks to the Beijing Olympics
- And Drima Turns 22!
- On Criminalizing Criticism of Islam
- Hilarious News of the Day: Sudan’s Stance On Georgia
- Beijing Olympics? What Olympics?
-
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
-
Hello!

Welcome to the blogging spot of a full time Sudanese-born college student and a part-time multi genre music producing freak, aspiring entrepreneur and political junkie.
WARNING: I’m very sarcastic! -
Email Me
sudanesethinker@yahoo DOT com
-
I Write for Global Voices
-
SocialRank: The Discovery Engine of the Blogosphere
-
I'm on Toot
-
Search
-
Just Practicing My Right
SUDANESE CONSTITUTION, PART TWO: BILL OF RIGHTS
Freedom of Expression and Media
39 (1) Every citizen shall have an unrestricted right to the freedom of expression, reception and dissemination of information, publication, and access to the press without prejudice to order, safety or public morals as determined by law.
(2) The State shall guarantee the freedom of the press and other media as shall be regulated by law in a democratic society.
(3) All media shall abide by professional ethics, shall refrain from inciting religious, ethnic, racial or cultural hatred and shall not agitate for violence or war.
-
Causes
-
I'm for Coexistance

-
Ads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial- No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.







Hi Drima,
I don’t agree with you on this one actually. I just do not think sanctions against Sudan are a good idea because they are not comprehensive or done in a concerted effort by the international community. Sudan, as you know, has a strategic and reliable partner in China. As the US divests from Sudan, all we really are doing is pushing Sudan further into bed with the Chinese govt. rather than cut off economic opportunity for Sudan. Keep in mind that China makes zero human rights requirements on the governments they do business with, so as the USA divests from Sudan, and China invests, we may be institutionalizing the human rights abuses that occur there even more, albeit unwittingly. Divestment also gives us less leverage over the course of time, especially since “he who pays the bills calls the shots.” I just don’t think it is wise to divest from Sudan as long as China and others will pick up the slack. Divestment only works if it’s done together.
It seems that piecemeal divestment is really a tool for people/entities to use in order to make it seem as if they are doing something when they have no other options. In this case, individually divesting from Sudan gives people and the US govt. something to pat themselves on the back over, but at the end of the day, it probably won’t work, and may turn out to be rather counterproductive. Of course the goal must be to stop human rights abuse in Sudan, I’m just not convinced divestment will do it, and worry it will just disengage Sudan from any discussion about improving human rights altogether since they won’t have any incentive to do so with China, India, and the AL as their major trading partners.
To be honest, I prefer a different tactic. I would like to figure out how to engage Sudan strategically so that all the people in the country feel as if they have mutual, unbiased partners who are interested in all the people of Sudan winning together. If Darfur’s initial problem was lack of constructive engagement from the govt., how can the international community address that while also helping the rest of Sudan meet their needs as well? This is where I think we need to put our brainstorming efforts.
These are just my two cents for whatever they’re worth. Thanks.
I never took the time to think about this one actually but that’s one hell of a good observation
[…] I never really gave the whole Sudan divestment thingy a lot of thought until I read this comment by PeacefulVanguard: Hi Drima, […]