From the monthly archives:

June 2006

History of Sudan: 100 Years in brief

by Drima on June 4, 2006

19th century
For most of the 19th century Sudan was an outpost of the Turco-Egyptian empire. Its inland boundaries were indistinct: southern Sudan - where most of the oil is - was used as a source of slaves and other commodities such as ivory and ostrich feathers. The vast southern and western territory was regarded by the Arabic-speaking Muslims of the Nile Valley around Khartoum as Dar al-Harib, or the place of war, in contrast to their civilised Dar as-Salaam, the place of peace. This perception continues to the present day.

A short-lived period of independence known as the Mahdiyya followed the Sudanese Mahdi’s siege of Khartoum and defeat of the British General Gordon, who had attempted reforms as the envoy of Egypt. When British forces led by Kitchener “reconquered” Sudan, Britain began a period of joint condominium rule with Egypt in which the south and west were “pacified” at the dawn of the 20th century.

1920s and 1930s
In the 1920s and 1930s the British administration closed off southern Sudan and the Nuba Mountains of South Kordofan, in a policy of separate development where English and Christianity were encouraged in contrast with the Arabic and Islam of the north. Ostensibly introduced to eliminate slavery and other exploitation, this policy isolated the communities of the south from outside trade at a time of rapid development in the north. After the Second World War, as independence loomed and the closed districts reopened, southerners and Nuba were unprepared for the political bargaining that followed. Options for linking Southern Sudan with Uganda were dropped in favour of the status quo - a united Sudan.

1940s-1956
In the run-up to Sudan’s independence in 1956, the civil service and administration were placed increasingly in Sudanese hands, with a predominance of Northern Sudanese since educated Southerners were rare. Feeling short-changed and aggrieved, separatist Southerners began an initially low-intensity civil war aimed at establishing an independent South.

1956-69 First Civil War / After Independence
Independent Sudan’s first Prime Minister, Ismail al-Azhari, lasted two years: a pattern of alternating chaotic civilian governments and military regimes was being established. The first dictator, General Abboud, confident of a military solution, escalated the civil war in the early 1960s but was brought down by a civilian uprising in October 1964. The war continued through five years of haphazard civilian rule dominated by arguments between Islamic sectarian parties, during which Sadiq al-Mahdi won and lost the position of Prime Minister at the precocious age of 36.

1969-1980s
When Colonel Jaafar Nimeiri seized power in May 1969 he was regarded as progressive and secular, respected by southerners as well as northerners because of his no-nonsense military background. Nimeiri achieved what the civilians did not: a peace agreement was signed in Addis Ababa in 1972, guaranteeing autonomy for the south.

Nimeiri presided over a period in which Sudan was regarded first as a potential agricultural breadbasket for the Arab world, and then as a source of oil wealth for the first time. However, the breadbasket vision crumbled as investors saw their projects mired in bureaucracy or foundering in their own impracticality: few survived in recognisable form. The impact of the 1970s OPEC oil price shocks on the Sudanese economy was equally damaging.

When Chevron began work in Sudan in 1975, Nimeiri amended his 1972 Oil Exploration Act to give his Minister of Energy complete authority to reach agreements with foreign companies.

The discovery of oil in Sudan came when the “breadbasket” dream was beginning to fade, and enabled Nimeiri to continue forecasting a brighter tomorrow as the economy worsened.

Shifting politically to the religious right, Nimeiri embarked on reconciliation initiatives with some of his former opponents. With Sadiq al-Mahdi’s Umma party success was shortlived, but with ((Dr Hassan al-Turabi)) and his National Islamic Front the outcome was the imposition of a harsh interpretation of Islamic sharia law in 1983.

So as you see, some of the problems we still face today could be blamed on the British and much of the others could be blamed on al-Turabi. Notice also that dictator Abboud was overthrown by a civilian uprising. If the coming elections don’t bring a positive result then the only way to move forward will be through civil disobedience. It worked with Abboud so maybe it can work again in our time.

{ 3 comments }

UN & AU Keep Your Word!

by Drima on June 4, 2006

SLA’s Abdul Wahed Mohamed al-Nur rejected the whole Darfur peace agreement. Apparently the retard wants UN mediation now. Sure! He wants UN mediation after almost 3 years of AU mediation. If you ask me, he’s one stupid fool and a filthy killer. There’s no honor in the way he and the others carried out their rebellion. UN & AU you better keep your word and enforce the sanctions you’ve been talking about all along.

{ 0 comments }

The Government Eats While The Population Starves

by Drima on June 3, 2006

Religiosity without much knowledge or education is a sure recipe for ignorance. The above cartoon shows the main problem facing the majority of the Sudanese people and infact Muslims as a whole. It is the attitude which is all about blaming it on the One up there. Ask people about Katrina or the Asian tsunami and surely some of them will say “hey, just accept it as it is the will of God”. Yup sure thing, every nasty crap that happens is the will of God. The fat man on the left represents the Sudanese government while the poor skinny man on the right represents the religious and uneducated Sudanese population. The fat man hides a bag of money behind his back and tells the poor man to be patient. He says to him “salvation is near my friend. Just stick to what you’re doing right now. Keep praying and worshipping… You know, just focus on the after life”. Sadly the poor skinny man (the general Sudanese population) falls for it and ends up believing in such things firmly. I strongly believe that this kind of attitude is the major reason why we Muslims in general are still so backward. Allah doesn’t change a people who don’t change what’s within themselves first. It is true that somethings such as natural disasters can’t be controled and are God’s/mother nature’s will. However simply giving up and reasoning it all as God’s will is a dumb and stupid attitude that just pisses me off so damn badly. I hate it. The debate between predestination and choice is a never ending one. So while we all try to figure it out, let’s please for a change try to take responsiblity for the bad things that happen and try to fix them. OKAY?

It’s so lovely isn’t it? And we Muslims still want to climb out of the hole we dug up and found ourselves in. The longer this attitude continues, the deeper the hole will get. Islam encourages us to seek knowledge and read. It encourages us to think. Sadly with this kind of attitude, Islam becomes nothing more but a cage. Let me say it again. Allah doesn’t change a people who don’t change what’s within themselves first. Muslims, please open up your minds to see who the enemy is. The enemy is ignorance and extremism. Stop blaming the Americans and Jews for every damn thing. Stop saying we are where we are because it is the will of Allah. Open up your eyes and see the deep hole you burried yourselves in. God is so great that He’s beyond our 100% understanding. Therefore drop the predestination VS choice debate. Let’s try something different for a while. Believe me, the result will be a much better one than what we experience today.

{ 14 comments }

The Japanese & American Relationship

by Drima on June 2, 2006

You know I’ve always wondered how two nations such as the United States and Japan can go from being such strong and opposing adversaries into the two nations we see today having a wonderfull relationship full of mutual respect and cooperation. I mean come on seriously, we’re talking about a Japan that boombam-sweet smacked Pearl Harbour and tore it into pieces and a United States which in an instant kaboom-sweet wiped about a quarter of a million Japanese people with two lovely nuclear bombs. How do you go from that to this. How do you go from that to the current American and Japanese relationship we say today. This is a topic I find highly worthy of my reading time.

Could the lessons it provides be applied to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict?? Yes? No? Ok, I know I’m crazy… bye

{ 9 comments }

Dissident Rebels Might Sign Darfur Peace Deal

by Drima on June 2, 2006

After giving up their fantasies of separating and forming their own country, the dissident rebels are now back saying they want to sign the peace agreement. This is a good step towards the right direction. I guess the rebels started freaking out when they realized that there was talk in the AU about sanctions being enforced on them incase they didn’t sign. Well, I hope they do sign. I mean hey, they said they’ll sign but saying something and doing it are 2 totally different things.
Even if/when peace is secured, basic necessities must start being provided in Darfur. Damn you, you corrupted Khartoum government. If you want to become filthy rich, fine but at least care a little bit for the peoples’ lives… just a little bit. Yes, no? You don’t want to? Not interested? Oh I thought so! However please remember something Mr. President Omar Hassan Al Bashir. None of us escapes death. So even if you manage to accumulate the biggest fortune of the 21st century and you end up being richer than Bill Gates, remember something. You will never be able to take a single penny along with you into the after life. NEVER! You might as well repent and start fixing your mistakes.
Allah yahdeekum! Walahi ya nas al 7akoma, Allah bas yahdeeeeekum!

{ 2 comments }